MergerWatch: How inside and exterior faculty mergers are comparable — and the way they’re totally different — science weblog

This audio is auto-generated. Please tell us you probably have suggestions.

Ricardo Azziz has held quite a few government positions in larger training and led the merger that resulted in Georgia Regents College, now Augusta College. He’s principal at Strategic Partnerships in Larger Schooling Consulting Group.

He writes the common Merger Watch opinion sequence on company restructuring in larger training.

Not too long ago, a number of universities and schools have explored or applied consolidations of faculties inside their campuses. How do consolidations or mergers of faculties inside the identical larger training establishment relate to mergers between totally different establishments? The quick reply — there are necessary similarities but in addition important distinctions that leaders should acknowledge to facilitate a extra profitable and fewer disruptive consolidation.    

How are these mergers comparable?

Mergers between establishments, when they aren’t solely about survival, stem from shared motivators: a want to create operational efficiencies, collaborations, new packages, expanded scholarship alternatives, and a normal rejuvenation and reenergizing of the events. 

So too are mergers of faculties or schools inside the identical establishment. 

A headshot image of Ricardo Azziz

Ricardo Azziz

Permission granted by Ricardo Azziz


Mergers between establishments are additionally pushed by a want to create higher operational efficiencies and monetary financial savings. It is the identical when a college or faculty goals to cut back the variety of schools or faculties on campus by consolidation, significantly if their enrollment has been flat or declining. Whereas it could be optimum to redirect financial savings to reinforce the coed and college expertise, they’re usually wanted to offset present deficits.  

For instance, North Dakota State College President David Prepare dinner not too long ago proposed lowering his establishment’s seven educational schools to 5. The transfer would start to handle a $7.6 million discount in state funding associated to declining scholar credit score hours on the college. The College of Wisconsin-River Falls proposed a plan to cut back the variety of schools on campus from 4 to 3 and save on administrative prices. Pennsylvania Western College, itself the results of a latest three-way merger, will consolidate its six educational schools into three because the college seeks to chop prices whereas reversing enrollment losses. And the School of St. Scholastica, in Minnesota, introduced in April that it’s consolidating its six faculties to 3.

Consolidation of faculties usually means a concomitant discount within the variety of executives, employees and even school, enhancing financial savings. Nonetheless, much like institutional mergers, the financial savings in human capital are necessary however comparatively modest in comparison with everything of an establishment’s finances. 

For instance, PennWest estimates it can save roughly $2 million — or 0.67% of its roughly $300 million finances. This could not come as a shock since, regardless of what some school assume, the price of administrative help inside larger training establishments is usually modest relative to the working finances of all the enterprise. 

One ultimate similarity lies within the degree of authorization required to execute this organizational restructuring. Such proposals require the approval of the establishment’s governing boards. 

What are the variations?

There are, nonetheless, essential variations between inside mergers and institutional mergers. Most vital is the diploma of transparency, communication, and college and employees involvement. Normally, when mergers, consolidations or acquisitions of establishments are being explored, everything of the consideration and negotiation part is confidential. It entails just some members of the campus group, particularly the board and high-level executives. Solely when the deal is finalized does the rest of the campus and area people discover out and have interaction within the implementation course of.  

Alternatively, when an inside merger of faculties or schools is being thought-about, the intention is telegraphed effectively upfront, suggestions is sought, and committees of employees and college are appointed. Whereas this does not imply that school and employees have the facility to approve such a consolidation — the governing board has that sole authority — the initiative doesn’t come as a shock. Stakeholders often have the chance to, at a minimal, guarantee their voices are heard and affect the form of the consolidation. 

A ultimate distinction lies within the board’s willingness to help the initiative. Inner mergers are sometimes supported readily, in contrast to mergers between establishments, which usually entail painstaking and troublesome deliberations by board members.

As for institutional mergers, you will need to word that not all inside consolidations are essentially the appropriate technique. 

I used to be beforehand president of Georgia Regents College, now referred to as Augusta College, proper after it had been created by a merger of establishments. Following the merger, we intentionally break up the then School of Arts & Sciences. The large faculty, which had housed over 60% of all undergraduates, grew to become the Pamplin School of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences and the School of Science & Arithmetic. This allowed for higher and distinct consideration to be paid to the liberal arts and, individually, to the STEM fields. It additionally leveraged the brand new relationship to the tutorial well being sciences ensuing from the merger of Georgia Well being Sciences College and Augusta State College. 

Supply hyperlink